Research paper critique questions, was every...
If appropriate, are subtest reliabilities given? The discussion should use previous research work and theoretical concepts as the context in which the new study can be interpreted. When the six leadership styles were examined separately, there was a significant difference in social support between males and females. It would have also been possible to actually go to individual schools and meet with the coaches as a group to administer surveys.
How to Critique a Research Article A larger sample with regard to all categories would have aided in the data analysis, particularly when looking for possible interactions between gender and coaching level.
With regard to coaching level, 25 0. There were any major omissions in the results, which could indicate bias Percentages have been used to disguise small sample sizes The data generated is consistent with the data collected Negative results are just as relevant as research that produces positive results but as mentioned previously may be omitted in publication due to editorial bias.
What kind of America do you want to live in? How can I be a better friend?
Are theoretical and practical implications of the findings discussed? Evaluate the sampling method and the sample used in this study. Is the method of sample selection described one that is likely to result in a representative, watson-glaser critical thinking appraisal test sample? Discussion Conclusions and Recommendation 1.
- The researchers mention that the scales were given in a variety of settings.
- While the study has merit, the methods need to be re-evaluated.
- What do critical thinking mean to you how long can a paragraph in an essay be
Are the tests of significance described appropriate, given the hypotheses and design of the study? The analysis showed there were no significant differences between male and female coaches in overall leadership behaviors. Design and Procedure 1.
Critique of research articles
At other times the barrier is harder, or even impossible to cross. Are the possible effects of uncontrolled variables on the results discussed? Graphs and tables should be clear and promote clarity of the text.
What is are the major finding s? The internal consistency for each section was calculated: Research Critique 1 Jamber, E.
How to Review a Research Paper
When the six leadership styles were examined separately, there was a significant difference in social support between males and females. Is the rationale given for the selection of the instruments or measurements used?
Are the results clearly presented? It is not unreasonable to suppose that coaches of female athletes, particularly at the junior high and high school levels, will demonstrate more social support than those of male athletes.
What is are the major finding s?
If a sample was selected, is the method of selecting the sample clearly described? It would have also been possible to actually go to individual schools and meet with the coaches as a group to administer surveys.
If appropriate, are subtest reliabilities given? If an instrument was developed specifically for the study, are administration, scoring or tabulating, and interpretation procedures fully described? High school coaches scored much higher than college level coaches in democratic behavior.
Did the researcher avoid the use of volunteers?
Scholarly Article Critique Student Example
If appropriate, are subtest reliabilities given? Discussion Conclusions and Recommendation 1. Journal of Sport Behavior, 20, Are the tests of significance interpreted using the appropriate degrees of freedom? The power of the study needs to be increased by obtaining a larger sample size.
There was no information, however, regarding the validity of the Cover letter for shipping and receiving coordinator.
How to Critique
Are the tables and figures if any well organized and easy to understand? Perhaps obtaining permission to administer the survey during these meetings would have been possible.
Scales were administered in a number of environmental settings: Certain coaching styles are more applicable for individual sports wrestling, track, and tennis than for team sports football, soccer, and basketball. The researchers mention that the scales were given in a variety of settings.
Is instrument validity discussed and coefficients given if appropriate?
What were the strengths and weaknesses of the study?