Literature review a handbook for students, library resources
The book takes a student friendly approach to offer complete novices a simple review of a process which is often central to producing a research study. Doing your literature review: Cronin P. Their model follows the systematic data processing approach comprised of three steps, namely: If you cannot think of a topic:
- SearchWorks Catalog
- Literature Reviews
- Literature Reviews - Sports and Exercise Therapy - The Library at Leeds Beckett University
- Contact information
- Writing a Literature Review (EDUC) — The University of Melbourne Handbook
- Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach [Internet].
- Handbook home
- Succeeding with your Literature Review: A Handbook for Students : Paul Oliver :
In addition to screening material for inclusion, members of the review team may need to assess the scientific quality of the selected studies, that is, appraise the rigour of the research design and methods. As explained above, systematic reviews seek to identify causation.
There is no preconceived plan to systematically review all of the literature although this can be done. Table 9.
Cronin P. NOT is particularly helpful, allowing you to eliminate irrelevant results. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses; pp.
Therefore, there is a growing need for appraisal and synthesis of prior systematic reviews to ensure that decision-making is constantly informed by the best available accumulated evidence. To this end, they provide a number of recommendations to strengthen knowledge development towards improving the design and execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring.
As shown in Table 9.
Deeks J. Further, authors of descriptive reviews extract from each study certain characteristics of interest, such as publication year, research methods, data collection techniques, and direction or strength of research outcomes e. Journal for Healthcare Quality. Jesson J. References Ammenwerth E. To achieve this, when devising a list of terms to search for, you should: Assessing the quality of primary studies: The book takes a student friendly approach to offer complete novices a simple review of a process which is often central to producing a research study.
Researchers are often relatively free to use a diversity of approaches to search, identify, and select relevant scientific articles, describe their operational characteristics, present how the individual studies fit together, and formulate conclusions.
Russell Sage Foundation; Mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance at healthcare appointments. The authors literature review a handbook for students extracted data from the selected articles and curriculum vitae european format in english several tables, one for each outcome category.
A second screen of full-text articles, again by two independent members of the research team, ensured that the studies described phrs.
Literature Reviews - Sports and Exercise Therapy - The Library at Leeds Beckett University
Several search terms relating to phrs were used during this process. The book also includes examples of common pitfalls, good practice, key terms and questions to reinforce student learning and reflection.
Research synthesis as a scientific process; pp. There exist three main coverage strategies. Look at the keywords listed in relevant articles. Findings from eight rcts involving 6, participants were pooled into meta-analyses to calculate the magnitude of effects that mobile text message reminders have on the rate of attendance at healthcare appointments compared to no reminders and phone call reminders.
Then further deconstruct your keywords - are you sure you have thought of all of the possible ways to describe your topic? The Structure of a Literature Review 7. The boxes on reading and evaluating articles offer some suggestions on analysing them.
Faculty like to use narrative reviews in the classroom because they are often more up to date than textbooks, provide a single source for students to reference, and expose students to peer-reviewed literature Green et al.
In line with their main objective, scoping reviews usually conclude with the presentation of a detailed research agenda for future works along with potential implications for both practice and research. Includes bibliographical references p.
Writing a Literature Review (EDUC) — The University of Melbourne Handbook
A rigorous example of one such review in the eHealth domain is presented by Mickan, Atherton, Roberts, Heneghan, and Tilson on the use of handheld computers by healthcare professionals and their impact on access to information and clinical decision-making. Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions.
These studies were identified through a formal and systematic search in four databases between and Kirkevold M. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach [Internet].
Unlike other review types, critical reviews attempt to take a reflective account of the research that has been done in a particular area of interest, and assess its credibility by using appraisal instruments or critical interpretive methods. Among other methods, literature reviews are essential for: Analyzing data using quantitative or qualitative methods.
We highly recommend that prospective authors of narrative reviews consult these useful sources before embarking on their work. Results indicate that the majority of systematic reviews in this particular area suffer from important methodological flaws and biases that impair their internal validity and limit their usefulness for clinical and decision-making purposes.
Communications of the Association for Information Systems. Whether the search is comprehensive or not, whether it involves a methodical approach for data extraction and synthesis or not, it is important that the review documents in an explicit and transparent manner the steps and approach that were used in the process of its development.
McTigue K. This subject will include practical classes on specific literature research and management strategies as well as classes focusing on the composition and writing of literature reviews.
There exist several methods and techniques for synthesizing quantitative e. Releasing the social science research imagination. These authors reviewed the existing literature on personal health record phr systems including design, functionality, implementation, applications, outcomes, and benefits.
British Medical Journal. Integrative nursing research — an important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice.
Relating the Review to the Rest of the Dissertation. Analyzing and Categorizing the Literature Critically 6. Design a literature review which is related to the main facets of a research projectConduct a logically-planned search for relevant literature Determine which literature is most suited to inclusion in your studyAnalyse the literature, drawing comparisons and connections where appropriateAppraise the strengths and weaknesses of relevant literatureWrite logically and rationally about the key features of literature Write a literature review in a sound academic styleUnderstand how to relate a literature review to other elements of your study or dissertation Written by an author with extensive experience of supervising and examining undergraduate, Masters and doctoral dissertations, this book covers the latest trends, such as: As in most narrative reviews, the scope of the research questions being investigated is broad: Meta-analyses are regarded as powerful tools for deriving meaningful conclusions.
RSS feeds, wikis, grey literature, blogs literature review a handbook for students forms of open access publishing. Your Academic Librarians.
Succeeding with your Literature Review: A Handbook for Students : Paul Oliver :
The extracted data must be presented in a meaningful way that suggests a new contribution to the extant literature Jesson et al. By enclosing a phrase within quotation marks you can search for keywords grouped together in a certain order - e. Retrieved from http: Evaluating papers: Review of General Psychology.